HomeAbout UsSponsorsParticipating SchoolsSchool ResourcesStudent ResourcesStaff ResourcesFamily ResourcesResultsContact Us

The Impact of Removing Snacks of Low Nutritional Value From Middle Schools

The Impact of Removing Snacks of Low Nutritional Value From Middle Schools

The Impact of Removing Snacks of Low Nutritional Value From Middle Schools
 
A new article in this month’s issue of the Health Education and Behavior journal is based on Connecticut’s 2003-2005 Healthy Snack Pilot.
 
The article addresses two concerns regarding selling healthy foods at
school: Do children compensate at home by eating more unhealthy foods? Do school-based obesity programs increase student preoccupation with weight?
 
Findings indicate that removing low nutrition items from schools decreased students’ consumption with no compensatory increase at home and no differences in students’ reported weight concerns. See summary below:
The Impact of Removing Snacks of Low Nutritional Value From Middle Schools Removing low nutrition snacks from schools is controversial. Although the objective is to decrease the consumption of these foods at school, some critics argue that children will compensate by eating more of these foods at home. Others worry that school-based obesity prevention programs will increase student preoccupation with weight. The present study examines these concerns. Three middle schools replaced snacks and beverages that did not meet nutrition guidelines, whereas three comparison schools made no systematic changes. Students were surveyed about dietary intake and weight concerns before and after implementation of the intervention.
Findings indicate that removing low nutrition items from schools decreased students’ consumption with no compensatory increase at home. Furthermore, there were no differences in students’ reported weight concerns. These results support the value of strengthening school nutrition standards to improve student nutrition and provide evidence dispelling concerns that such efforts will have unintended negative consequences.
 
Authors:
Marlene B. Schwartz, PhD Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, marlene.schwartz@yale.edu
 
Sarah A. Novak, PhD Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York
 
Susan S. Fiore, MS, RD Connecticut State Department of Education, Middletown
 
To view the online version of this article, go to http://heb.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/36/6/999.

Unless otherwise specified, HealthMPowers is not responsible for the content of any linked site not hosted by healthmpowers.org. The listing of HealthMPowers' name with any of these sites should not be misconstrued as an endorsement of the information in them unless explicitly noted.Questions or comments? E-mail us at info@healthmpowers.org
This web site uses Kentico CMS, the content management system for ASP.NET developers.